|
Publications reporting on the shirtwaist strike at
first made light of the demonstration. A New York Times article covering
the meeting of heads of the shirtwaist factories featured the headline “Girl
Strikers Dance as Employers Meet,” comparing the serious meeting of
the manufacturers (in which the employers decided they would not falter
on their open-shop stance) to the impromptu dancing at strike headquarters.
The New York Herald reported in a flattering light on November 28 on the
manufacturers themselves were organizing to fight the strikers: “Representing
nearly one hundred million dollars of capital, six hundred members of the
Association of Waist and Dress Manufacturers, at a convention in the Hoffman
House yesterday, announced that they would perfect their organization and
fight the strike.” The headline? “600 Men Agree to Fight Strikers.”
The article also features the employers’ threat to move manufacturing
factories altogether elsewhere: “We will move our plants to Philadelphia.
It is just as good a site and we can work there just as well.” But
coverage did not remain so skeptical of the power of the strikers. Newspapers
began to report on the actions of the wealthy socialites like Mrs. O.H.P.
Belmont, who headed up the Political Equality Association, a suffragist’s
organization, and organized a meeting at the Hippodrome theater for strikers
to meet and set the path for duration of the strike. The New York Times
treated as news Mrs. Belmont’s pronouncement that she would buy
only union shirtwaists, but in the same article, the Times manages to
illustrate Belmont’s efforts to unite the opposing sides of the
strike after its end at a dinner. As the strike wore on, the Times ran
several pieces concerning the ill treatment of the strikers by police
and suspected hired thugs. The silly dancing girls of November 28 become
by December 5 girls capable of marching arm in arm to City Hall to boldly
inform the mayor of their plight and their mistreatment by those in city
uniform. When addressing the concerns of the shirtwaist makers, the Times
illustrates manufacturers not as villains, but as holders of the key to
the end of the demonstration. Eventually, the bigger factory heads held
out long enough to maintain their stance against a closed union shop.
The strikers, gaining on all other demands, also declared victory.
Bibliography
|