
By 1900, the parks were extremely popular and park
accommodations filled to capacity summer after summer. Despite lower
fares and appeals to a broader target market in advertising,
train travel was still costly. Additionally, all national
park, which now included Sequoia, Crater Lake, and Mt.
Rainier, were in the West, far from the major population
centers. By 1905, visitation in Yellowstone only totaled
13,000, with Yosemite's only slightly higher because of its
proximity to San Francisco. Preservationists and railroad
executives alike faced a difficult task in defending the
profitability and popularity of the parks well enough to
convince the government that economic resource exploitation was
not a more worthwhile approach to the American wilderness.
For all that men like Muir and Roosevelt had
accomplished in bringing the issue of preservation into the national
discussion, they were not able to remove the
clause leftover from the National Park bill that granted
Congress the power to repeal protection from National Parks
where economic development was feasible. The preservationists
felt vindicated when the Yosemite Valley won National Park
Status in 1890 and was given 1500 additional acres of timber
and grasslands along the foothills of the Sierras, but in
1905 local timber companies and farmers lobbied ardently enough
to reclaim valuable timber, grazing, and mineral areas
totalling roughly 540 square miles, one-third of the
protected land (Runte, NP 56). This reversal of federal
protection did not bode well for preservationists. John Muir
and others objected strenuously
to park reduction, but they could not defend the
foothills from economic exploitation by
claiming them as National Monuments; they were not the rugged
peaks of the Sierras or the centuries-old antiquities of
American history. They were simply not majestic enough
to qualify as monuments to
America. Shortly after this strike against
Yosemite, the city of San Francisco dealt another blow to the
ecological safety of the valley. San Francisco was in search
of a fresh water source and after years of looking, the city
settled on the Hetch-Hetchy Valley which lay in the boundaries
of the National Park. Preservationsits claimed that
Hetch-Hetchy was equal to Yosemite in its sublimity and
splendor but not many visitors had seen it because access to
Hetch-Hetchy was limited to rough trails which most park
tourists did not explore. Despite the outspoken protests
against the suggestion to dam the valley for a reservoir, the
needs of 500,000 San Franciscans took priority over the few
hundred tourists who visited each summer. Late in 1905,
Secretary of the Interior James A. Garfield approved San
Francisco's request and permitted a dam in the gorge.
The contest between the aesthetic and ecological character of
Yosemite and the practical needs of 500,000 California
residents shows that the railroads may have met with too much
success in their efforts to promote travel and settlement in
the west. In the early 1900's, the West had been
settled. Early rail campaigns and government land rushes drew
hundreds of thousands from Europe and the East coast, and
cities and towns were arising from the prairies, deserts, and
mountains by the moment. Former outposts such as Seattle and
Portland developed into powerful Western communities with
urgent practical needs. A double standard emerged in the
country that still persists. The west
had been a place of such cultural importance that its national
parks and forest reserves seemed crucial to the protection of
an American identity. Even after the burgeoning Western
population demonstrated an economic need for resources and
land, their need to earn a living and build communities
remained secondary to the preservation of an idea of an
American past. Eastern land was readily sacrificed for
economic development, but the West was more a living museum
than a place to live and protection was and is a more prominent
question in Western states. Despite their possible
culpability in the matter, rail executives and preservationists
worried that the Hetch-Hetchy debacle was the death knell for
the parks. Preservationists renewed fears of ecological
decimation in the well-preserved West and railroad officials
feared massive finanical ruin from the failure to capitalize on
the significant investments in park accommodations,
advertising, and passenger car upgrades. With the threat of
losing the parks to economic devleopment, the railroads and the
preservationists cemented their relationship and worked to keep
these regions intact. The rails responded accordingly and
increased advertising which courted the nature tourist and the
society tourist alike to keep the crowds coming.
Preservationists continued to lobby for a central park
management authority and permanent protection in each park, and
the railroads did their part to heighten interest in a
wilderness vacation. The "See America First" campaign was
devoted to the national park cause, and the appeal to
patriotism was one of the most successful marketing strategies
the railroads concocted. If the parks were to be protected,
the rails reasoned, people had to visit them. "See America
First" addressed the pervasive cultural anxiety about America's
ability to compete with Europe for visitation and encouraged
travel to the American West instead of the Alps or other
European destinations.
The advent of the automobile also spurred the railroads into
action, since the luxury of the Pullman could hardly compete with
the notoriety and novelty of a personal car, at least among the
very wealthy clientele long courted by the railroads.
Nonetheless, the railroads continued to devote funds to park
enhancements. Southern Pacific had recently built the
glamorous Del Portal Hotel just outside Yosemite's border and
announced plans to make a connection with the newly organized
Yosemite Valley Railroad, the first rail line to provide direct
access to the valley, thus making the difficult stage journey
into the park obsolete. Northern Pacific poured money into
upgrading Yellowstone establishments and worked to maintain its
association with the park in light of the new competition
presented by the arrival of the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St.
Paul line at the new "Gallatin Gateway" on Yellowstone's west
side. 

These posters demonstrate Northern Pacific's dedication to
the rail travel cause. The one on the top reminds the viewer that
Northern Pacific's line crosses the old frontier of Lewis and Clark and still
preserves the essence of that time in a park "reached directly only by this
line." Suspending the Northern Pacific logo under Yellowstone's memorial
Gateway arch in the poster on the bottom points out that the railroad was
instrumental in winning the protection of the first National Park
in America.
With new railroads
duplicating the Northern and Southern Pacific examples in new parks across the
West, establishing a centrally managed and
permanently protected National Park System became crucial for protecting
railroad investments in advertising and park facilities. The
Hetch-Hetchy affair proved that Congress would readily invoke
its right to exploit the resources in the park if necessary,
and rail officials and preservationists alike feared for the
integrity of their parks and profits. The public needed an
impetus to champion preservation, and railroad agents and
preservationists found their spokesman in horticulturist,
printer, and publisher J. Horace McFarland, a Pennsylvanian
with a dedicated interest in preservation. He was able to use
his position and his pen to elicit support through the popular
press. The Ladies' Home Journal, Century, and
Outlook magazines featured McFarland's columns which
encouraged support for scenic protection based on
worst-case-scenario appeals to preserve "America's heritage."
In his wildly popular "Beautiful America" column, he wrote in
support of preservation by reminding the public again of
Niagara Falls, calling it "The Monument of America's Shame and
Greed" (Runte, NP 87). McFarland's effectiveness in the matter was
his support for profit from preservation, and his approach appealed to
economically minded citizens and preservationists alike as he
criticized the downfall of Niagara in financial terms by
reminding Americans that their scenic wonders brought them
millions of dollars in tourist revenues in and out of the
park boundaries each year. This reminder of the
associative property of park profits in surrounding communities
was effective. Even though preservation on environmental
grounds was not easily defended at this time, economic appeals
guaranteed ready approval from the public. Because of the
publicity in the popular press, along with opinions like McFarland's, scenic preservation gained the popular support it
needed and park visitation rose sharply in the the 1909, 1910,
and 1911 seasons. Preservationists agreed with McFarland's
anti-development stance, and businessmen were inspired by his
reminder of the tourist dollars at stake. In 1911, when the
first National Parks Conference convened at Yellowstone to
discuss the problematic park management policies, the railroads
devoted their energies exclusively to the preservation effort.
The presence of several rail delegates demonstrated to the
preservationists that their cause was about to reach its peak.
Thanks to what Secretary of the Interior Walter Fisher referred
to as the "enlightened selfishness" of the railroads, an
organized and effective National Park System seemed a reality.
For the railroads, years of continued profits and free
publicity seemed a guarantee. Until the automobile became
affordable in the late 1910's, the Railroad and National Park
alliance was a win-win situation for businessmen,
conservationists, and tourists.
The news about the proposed National Park Service
generated new interest in park visitation. By 1905, only
13,000 people had visited Yellowstone since its dedication in 1872. During the summer
of 1915 alone, 51, 895 visitors entered the park and 45,000 of them arrived by Northern
Pacific to stay in railroad lodges and take advantage of railroad tours (Runte TD 28).
Yosemite was more popular during the early 1900's, managing to attract about 5,000
visitors annually, but once the National Park issue reached the public spotlight, its
numbers soared to nearly 50,000. Southern Pacific took advantage of the new Yosemite
Valley Line, advertising "Pullman Service All the Way" from Los Angeles to El Portal,
and the small railway shuttled nearly 15,000 passengers through the Merced River
Canyon to the valley (Runte, TD 54).

Throngs of eager tourists crowd the El Portal terminal to board cars bound
for the Yosemite Valley.
With figures like these, the profitability of preservation was undeniable. Railroad
testimonials during congressional hearings were instrumental in winning governmentally
legislated protection of America's scenery. President Woodrow Wilson signed the
National Park Act in 1916, and fifty years of railroad efforts culminated in the largest
system of federally protected land in the world. When the automobile arrived to
"democratize" long-distance travel in the following years, the new auto tourist had vast
public spaces to experience because of the aggressive railway campaigns and the communities
which surrounded the National Parks enjoyed stable economic prosperity from the yearly barrage of travelers and their tourist dollars.
The railroads could not have imagined their rapid downfall after the automobile's ascent, but their persistence in acquiring and protecting
national park lands and the images they implanted in the national consciousness left a
legacy that transcends their economic motivations.

Conclusions