Upon publication of Volume I of the Natural History Catesby
was elected to the Royal Society. It's immediate reception was overwhelmingly
positive as reviews in the Royal Society's Philosophical Transactions
can attest. In one such review Cromwell Mortimer, the Society's
secretary, called Natural History "the most magnificent work
I know since the Art of printing has been discovered."1While
Catesby's nomenclature would soon be rendered obsolete by Linneaus's
simpler binomial system, the work as a whole remained relevant long
after Catesby's death in 1749. In 1754 George Edwards revised and
reissued both volumes and in 1771 the publisher Benjamin White reissued
Edward's edition, adding Linnaean names to all Catesby's plants
and animals. Linnaeus himself, never having traveled to America,
relied on the Natural History as the source of thirty-eight
out of his hundred names of North American birds. Nearly fifty years
after the publication of the Natural History Thomas Jefferson
included a table on common North American birds in his Notes
on the State of Virginia. based on the work Catesby, Linnaeus
and Buffon. In 1785 when Jefferson published Notes on the State
of Virginia Catesby's Natural History remained the only
"complete, reliable, illustrated natural history of America." 2
When Lewis and Clark pored over the Natural History before
heading out West, it may have been at Jefferson's urging.
3
After the American Revolution, interest in Catesby's work, as with
most things American, waned in England. And as the scientific community
became increasingly specialized, made up of discrete groups of botanists,
ornithologists, ichthyologists and systematists, Catesby's generalist
approach fell into disfavor. By the time John James Audobon set
off to paint in South Carolina nearly a century later, Catesby had
been almost forgotten. Yet there has been a recent resurgence of
interest in Catesby's work. In 1997 an exhibition of the watercolors
he painted in America toured the States and finished at the Queen's
Gallery in London. His generalist's vision discerned how the various
components of nature fit together. He saw the impact of man on his
environment and the adaptation of plants and animals to these changes.
Catesby's ecological approach, which seemed obsolete shortly after
his death, again seems relevant.
|
|