Native
American Nations Yavapai-Apache
Nation
White Mountain Apache Tribe Oglala Sioux Tribe Rosebud Sioux Tribe Cheyenne River Lakota Nation Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma Cherokee Nation Southern Cherokee Nation Northern Cherokee Nation Cherokee Nation Eastern Band Oneida Indian Nation Oneida Nation of Wisconsin Seneca Nation of Indians Hopi Tribe Dakota Ojibway Tribal Council Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians Navajo Nation Southern Ute Indian Tribe Blackfeet Nation The Pueblo of Santa Ana The Pueblo of Zuni The Pueblo of Sandia Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska The Aleut Corporation Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association, Inc. Alaska Federation of Nations Cowasuck Band of the Pennacook/Abenaki People Northern Cheyenne Net Athabascan Nation/Chickaloon Village Crow Tribal Council Lenape Nation Haudenosaunee (Iriquois Nation) Makah Nation Mohegan Tribe Nez Perce Osage Nation Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Gila River Indian Community (Pima) Quinault United Tribe of Shawnee Indians
|
This site does not pretend to be ethnograpical in focus—it looks more to represent the Astor Collection and the collection's history. To counter that lack and the century-old view of Native Americans originally presented by the Astor, links have been provided at left for the viewer to explore more about native cultures on more equal terms. The passage of time tends to expose errors of perception, though those exposures may be mere chimera of perception themselves. The ethnography behind the Hall of the American Indian presents obvious flaws: the constriction and generalization caused by the procrustean attempt to put many tribes into a few language groups, a number of misclassifications, values-based judgements of the different groups, and an orientalist or essentialist approach still informed by the savage Indian/noble redman dichotomy and vanishing Indian myth. That being said, the organization of the Hall of the American Indian does represent an important stutter step forward in the history of American anthropology, a field that was undergoing a radical shift at the time due in part to Franz Boas and the idea of historic particularism that he diffused to an influential new generation of anthropologists. Prior to Boas cultural evolutionism had reigned, a progressivist theory that posited a universal idea of culture which only certain societies (i.e., western) had fully achieved. Boas countered this by claiming that every culture is valid and individually based on its specific historical circumstances. The best way to study and define cultures, Boas felt, was through empirical evidence. Thus the design of the Indian Grill Room in which one can "visit" a culture, room by room, and view the objects and photographic representations of everyday life, all of which "explain" the culture. The Native Cultures of the Americas section of the Smithsonian's Museum of Natural History is still set up in this same manner. While better than a universalist approach, the Boasian method creates static snapshots of societies that are often denied commentary on their own representation. Happily, the Smithsonian is countering its own deficiency with the opening of the National Museum of the American Indian.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |